[Note: Soapbox ahead, proceed with caution]
I have a good friend named Sarah Jane Semrad (also a fellow West Texan) who recently told me about an organization called Echoing Green. Their primary function is to provide seed funding and support to social entrepreneurs through fellowships. Sarah Jane is seeking the fellowship to fund La Reunion, her phenomenal idea for an artist residency and incubator here in Dallas (she assured me that even I could apply to live there as an artist in the medium of technology). Sarah and La Reunion deserve a full blog post (and there will be one soon), but I mentioned her because she suggested that I apply for the Echoing Green fellowship as well... so I am. The selection process is highly competitive (last year 883 applied and 20 were selected), and the final selections won't be made until May of next year, but I figure it's worth a shot!
Also, on the Echoing Green website I found an interesting article from Entrepreneur.com. In it they speak of the growing social entrepreneurship movement and a term known as the "double bottom line:"
Many entrepreneurs have started social enterprises, breaking nonprofit tradition by blending mission with money, referred to as "double bottom line" businesses.
When I try to understand this term along with others like the UN sanctioned "triple bottom line," Jed Emerson's "social return on investment," and our own concept of the "social trust," I feel like the alphabet soup gets a little academic and unproductive.
Arguing about the definition of "positive social impact" (or who is responsible for creating it) is like arguing about the meaning of life. It's a waste of time. As my dad once said, the man in the mirror is the only judge that matters... but that's easier said than done.
It has taken me 23 years of mistakes to learn that if I have to convince myself that I'm doing "enough," I'm not doing enough. If I have to convince myself that I'm doing the right thing, I'm probably not doing the right thing. And if I have to convince myself that it's not my problem, it is MOST DEFINITELY my problem. But that's the easy part. The hard part is actually doing something about it, and I'm still a newbie when it comes to this. You see, I can be, at times, very, VERY lazy. And apathetic. And greedy. And arrogant. And ignorant. More so on the ignorant, actually. Would you believe that I still don't know who to vote for in '08?
The way I see it, the problem is that it's way easier for me to do the wrong thing, or do just enough to get by, or do nothing at all (did I mention I was lazy?). So my challenge is finding a way to make the opposite true. In fact, I am such a flawed human being that unless I figure this out, I'm confidant that I will keep making these same mistakes over and over and over.
Thankfully for me, the internet exists. You see, the internet has done some pretty cool things. It is currently doing some pretty cool things. And my bet is that we at Momo can make it do some pretty cool things too. Like help me figure out who to vote for in '08.
But that's another story.